Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof
2013 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claude Mathonia (2216)
- Black
- Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof (2140)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claude Mathonia (2216) and Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof (2140) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claude Mathonia games or Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof games? This Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof?
Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claude Mathonia vs Alfred, Prof. Dr. Osthof, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.