Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina
2010 · Result ½–½ · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Josep Matas Artigues (1722)
- Black
- Neus Gallardo Pina (1840)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Josep Matas Artigues (1722) and Neus Gallardo Pina (1840) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Josep Matas Artigues games or Neus Gallardo Pina games? This Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina?
Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Josep Matas Artigues vs Neus Gallardo Pina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.