Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia
2006 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruben Mashal (2041)
- Black
- Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia (2003)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruben Mashal (2041) and Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia (2003) was played in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruben Mashal games or Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia games? This Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia?
Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (ECO A90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruben Mashal vs Ezequiel Alejandro Garcia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.