Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez
2019 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Roberto Maset (1797)
- Black
- Sebastian Vazquez (1828)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Roberto Maset (1797) and Sebastian Vazquez (1828) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Roberto Maset games or Sebastian Vazquez games? This Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez?
Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Sebastian Vazquez.
What opening was played in Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Roberto Maset vs Sebastian Vazquez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.