Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav
Corr, 1985 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mascelloni
- Black
- Lotti Abhinav (1032)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 1985
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mascelloni and Lotti Abhinav (1032) was played at Corr in 1985 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mascelloni games or Lotti Abhinav games? This Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav?
Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav (1985) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (ECO E66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mascelloni vs Lotti Abhinav, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.