Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos
Zonal 2.4, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation (A62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas (2240)
- Black
- Marco Pazos (1985)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zonal 2.4
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation (A62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas (2240) and Marco Pazos (1985) was played at Zonal 2.4 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation (A62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas games or Marco Pazos games? This Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos?
Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas.
What opening was played in Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation (ECO A62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas vs Marco Pazos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.