David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero
2009 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Pires Tavares Martins (1812)
- Black
- Ruben Vila Vaquero (1738)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Pires Tavares Martins (1812) and Ruben Vila Vaquero (1738) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Pires Tavares Martins games or Ruben Vila Vaquero games? This David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero?
David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero (2009) finished 1–0, a win for David Pires Tavares Martins.
What opening was played in David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Pires Tavares Martins vs Ruben Vila Vaquero, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.