Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo
CT20/pr10, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sérgio A. Martins (2042)
- Black
- Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo (1609)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CT20/pr10
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sérgio A. Martins (2042) and Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo (1609) was played at CT20/pr10 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sérgio A. Martins games or Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo games? This Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo?
Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo.
What opening was played in Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sérgio A. Martins vs Francisco Ruiz-Jarabo Pelayo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.