David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Pires Tavares Martins (2402)
- Black
- Alexander Belezky (2428)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Pires Tavares Martins (2402) and Alexander Belezky (2428) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Pires Tavares Martins games or Alexander Belezky games? This David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky?
David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Pires Tavares Martins vs Alexander Belezky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.