Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo
2. Ivy League Challenge, 2019 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Isaac Martinez (2068)
- Black
- Joseph F. Bellissimo (2201)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 2. Ivy League Challenge
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Isaac Martinez (2068) and Joseph F. Bellissimo (2201) was played at 2. Ivy League Challenge in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Isaac Martinez games or Joseph F. Bellissimo games? This Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo?
Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (ECO D27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Isaac Martinez vs Joseph F. Bellissimo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.