David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas
2010 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Martinez Sandoval (2112)
- Black
- Pablo Garcia Cardenas (2316)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Martinez Sandoval (2112) and Pablo Garcia Cardenas (2316) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Martinez Sandoval games or Pablo Garcia Cardenas games? This David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas?
David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Martinez Sandoval vs Pablo Garcia Cardenas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.