Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano
10. American Continental, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Open (B32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Martinez Romero (2404)
- Black
- Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano (2535)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 10. American Continental
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Martinez Romero (2404) and Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano (2535) was played at 10. American Continental in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Martinez Romero games or Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano games? This Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano?
Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano.
What opening was played in Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Martinez Romero vs Carlos Antonio Hevia Alejano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.