Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez
ESP/W/P/128 (ESP), 2021 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense (D80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Martínez Puigrós (2044)
- Black
- Manuel Piqueras Jiménez (1910)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP/W/P/128 (ESP)
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense (D80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Martínez Puigrós (2044) and Manuel Piqueras Jiménez (1910) was played at ESP/W/P/128 (ESP) in 2021 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense (D80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Martínez Puigrós games or Manuel Piqueras Jiménez games? This Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez?
Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez (2021) finished 1–0, a win for Ricardo Martínez Puigrós.
What opening was played in Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense (ECO D80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Martínez Puigrós vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.