Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena
2017 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlos Martinez Lopez (2082)
- Black
- Angel David Silva Pena (1784)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlos Martinez Lopez (2082) and Angel David Silva Pena (1784) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlos Martinez Lopez games or Angel David Silva Pena games? This Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena?
Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Angel David Silva Pena.
What opening was played in Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlos Martinez Lopez vs Angel David Silva Pena, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.