Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos
2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafael Martinez Ferrer (1710)
- Black
- Jaume Llados Clos (1562)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafael Martinez Ferrer (1710) and Jaume Llados Clos (1562) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafael Martinez Ferrer games or Jaume Llados Clos games? This Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos?
Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Rafael Martinez Ferrer.
What opening was played in Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (ECO C31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafael Martinez Ferrer vs Jaume Llados Clos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.