Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre
2016 · Result ½–½ · Alekhine Defense (B03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Martinez De Navascues (1912)
- Black
- Rafael Matesanz Bonastre (1732)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Alekhine Defense (B03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Martinez De Navascues (1912) and Rafael Matesanz Bonastre (1732) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Alekhine Defense (B03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Martinez De Navascues games or Rafael Matesanz Bonastre games? This Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Alekhine Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre?
Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre?
The game opened with the Alekhine Defense (ECO B03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Martinez De Navascues vs Rafael Matesanz Bonastre, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.