Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres
2011 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense (D10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero (1859)
- Black
- Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres (1926)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Slav Defense (D10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero (1859) and Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres (1926) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense (D10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero games or Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres games? This Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres?
Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres?
The game opened with the Slav Defense (ECO D10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hugo Esteban Martinez Baquero vs Alex Daniel Hernandez Torres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.