Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez
2018 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Enric Martin Sanchez (1941)
- Black
- David Juan Rueda Marquez (2075)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Enric Martin Sanchez (1941) and David Juan Rueda Marquez (2075) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Enric Martin Sanchez games or David Juan Rueda Marquez games? This Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez?
Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Enric Martin Sanchez vs David Juan Rueda Marquez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.