Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez
2012 · Result ½–½ · Indian Defense (A45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero (1863)
- Black
- Fernando Cebada Benitez (1953)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Indian Defense (A45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero (1863) and Fernando Cebada Benitez (1953) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Indian Defense (A45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero games or Fernando Cebada Benitez games? This Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez?
Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez?
The game opened with the Indian Defense (ECO A45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Javier Martin-Consuegra Barrilero vs Fernando Cebada Benitez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.