Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher
2011 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Harald Marschalek (1777)
- Black
- Juergen Wantscher (1811)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Harald Marschalek (1777) and Juergen Wantscher (1811) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Harald Marschalek games or Juergen Wantscher games? This Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher?
Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Harald Marschalek.
What opening was played in Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Harald Marschalek vs Juergen Wantscher, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.