Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo
Sao Jose dos Campos BRA, Aberto 2012, 2012 · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yaniet Marrero Lopez (2304)
- Black
- Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2385)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Sao Jose dos Campos BRA, Aberto 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yaniet Marrero Lopez (2304) and Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2385) was played at Sao Jose dos Campos BRA, Aberto 2012 in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yaniet Marrero Lopez games or Leandro Daniel Perdomo games? This Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo?
Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yaniet Marrero Lopez vs Leandro Daniel Perdomo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.