Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida
2012 · Result 1–0 · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eduardo Marques De Oliveira (1993)
- Black
- Flavio De Castro E Almeida (1586)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eduardo Marques De Oliveira (1993) and Flavio De Castro E Almeida (1586) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eduardo Marques De Oliveira games or Flavio De Castro E Almeida games? This Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida?
Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Eduardo Marques De Oliveira.
What opening was played in Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eduardo Marques De Oliveira vs Flavio De Castro E Almeida, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.