Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed
27. Sharjah Int Blitz, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikayel Margaryan (1403)
- Black
- Fareed 1981 Ahmed (1932)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 27. Sharjah Int Blitz
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikayel Margaryan (1403) and Fareed 1981 Ahmed (1932) was played at 27. Sharjah Int Blitz in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikayel Margaryan games or Fareed 1981 Ahmed games? This Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed?
Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Fareed 1981 Ahmed.
What opening was played in Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikayel Margaryan vs Fareed 1981 Ahmed, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.