Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria
2004 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miriam Marco Francisco (1932)
- Black
- Ernesto Pradas Soria (2052)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miriam Marco Francisco (1932) and Ernesto Pradas Soria (2052) was played in 2004 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miriam Marco Francisco games or Ernesto Pradas Soria games? This Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria?
Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria (2004) finished 1–0, a win for Miriam Marco Francisco.
What opening was played in Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miriam Marco Francisco vs Ernesto Pradas Soria, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.