Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao
EU Ch Union SCIPT, date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Marak (1902)
- Black
- Riccardo Di Lao (2138)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- EU Ch Union SCIPT
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Marak (1902) and Riccardo Di Lao (2138) was played at EU Ch Union SCIPT and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Marak games or Riccardo Di Lao games? This Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao?
Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao finished 0–1, a win for Riccardo Di Lao.
What opening was played in Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Marak vs Riccardo Di Lao, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.