Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic
Becici, 1993 · Result 1–0 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergej Manojlovic (1686)
- Black
- Branko Stanojevic (2380)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Becici
- Year
- 1993
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergej Manojlovic (1686) and Branko Stanojevic (2380) was played at Becici in 1993 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergej Manojlovic games or Branko Stanojevic games? This Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic?
Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic (1993) finished 1–0, a win for Sergej Manojlovic.
What opening was played in Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergej Manojlovic vs Branko Stanojevic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.