Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston
91. ch-Paris IdF 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antoine Manoeuvre (2314)
- Black
- David J Eggleston (2376)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 91. ch-Paris IdF 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antoine Manoeuvre (2314) and David J Eggleston (2376) was played at 91. ch-Paris IdF 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antoine Manoeuvre games or David J Eggleston games? This Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston?
Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston (2016) finished 0–1, a win for David J Eggleston.
What opening was played in Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antoine Manoeuvre vs David J Eggleston, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.