Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky
MVS Ch, 1999 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tobias Mann (1765)
- Black
- Patrick Viakofsky (1906)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- MVS Ch
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tobias Mann (1765) and Patrick Viakofsky (1906) was played at MVS Ch in 1999 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tobias Mann games or Patrick Viakofsky games? This Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky?
Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky (1999) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tobias Mann vs Patrick Viakofsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.