Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra
Corr, 2001 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pierre-Damien Manisse (1740)
- Black
- Alfredo Dutra (2032)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pierre-Damien Manisse (1740) and Alfredo Dutra (2032) was played at Corr in 2001 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pierre-Damien Manisse games or Alfredo Dutra games? This Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra?
Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra (2001) finished 0–1, a win for Alfredo Dutra.
What opening was played in Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pierre-Damien Manisse vs Alfredo Dutra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.