Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara
Vugar Gashimov Mem 2018, 2018 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (2814)
- Black
- David Navara (2745)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Vugar Gashimov Mem 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (2814) and David Navara (2745) was played at Vugar Gashimov Mem 2018 in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (D90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Shakhriyar Mamedyarov games or David Navara games? This Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara?
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Shakhriyar Mamedyarov.
What opening was played in Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs David Navara, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.