Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel
Ruhr Ch Seniors 5th, date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Heinz Maletzki
- Black
- August Giebel (1710)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Ruhr Ch Seniors 5th
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Heinz Maletzki and August Giebel (1710) was played at Ruhr Ch Seniors 5th and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (A22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Heinz Maletzki games or August Giebel games? This Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel?
Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel finished 0–1, a win for August Giebel.
What opening was played in Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation (ECO A22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Heinz Maletzki vs August Giebel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.