Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf
39. Olympiad Men, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Prachand Man Malakar (1959)
- Black
- Khalil Bukhalaf (2004)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 39. Olympiad Men
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Prachand Man Malakar (1959) and Khalil Bukhalaf (2004) was played at 39. Olympiad Men in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Prachand Man Malakar games or Khalil Bukhalaf games? This Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf?
Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Prachand Man Malakar vs Khalil Bukhalaf, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.