Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili
2010 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Makeev (1028)
- Black
- David Gochelashvili (2447)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Makeev (1028) and David Gochelashvili (2447) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Makeev games or David Gochelashvili games? This Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili?
Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Makeev vs David Gochelashvili, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.