Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov
RUS/TC7/sf (RUS), 2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oleg Maiorov (2383)
- Black
- Valentin Petrovich Baklanov (2405)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- RUS/TC7/sf (RUS)
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oleg Maiorov (2383) and Valentin Petrovich Baklanov (2405) was played at RUS/TC7/sf (RUS) in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oleg Maiorov games or Valentin Petrovich Baklanov games? This Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov?
Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oleg Maiorov vs Valentin Petrovich Baklanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.