Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski
Wuerzburg Open, 1992 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Mahner (1866)
- Black
- Adam Orlowski (1022)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Wuerzburg Open
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Mahner (1866) and Adam Orlowski (1022) was played at Wuerzburg Open in 1992 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (B61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Mahner games or Adam Orlowski games? This Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski?
Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski (1992) finished 0–1, a win for Adam Orlowski.
What opening was played in Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Mahner vs Adam Orlowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.