Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai
2009 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Istvan Gellert Magyary (1356)
- Black
- Daniel Koltai (1503)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Istvan Gellert Magyary (1356) and Daniel Koltai (1503) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Istvan Gellert Magyary games or Daniel Koltai games? This Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai?
Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Istvan Gellert Magyary.
What opening was played in Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Istvan Gellert Magyary vs Daniel Koltai, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.