Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri
C.to Regionale Sardegna, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fabrizio Magrini (2158)
- Black
- Fabio Saccheri (1875)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- C.to Regionale Sardegna
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fabrizio Magrini (2158) and Fabio Saccheri (1875) was played at C.to Regionale Sardegna in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (C57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fabrizio Magrini games or Fabio Saccheri games? This Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri?
Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Fabrizio Magrini.
What opening was played in Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Knight Attack (ECO C57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fabrizio Magrini vs Fabio Saccheri, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.