Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi
ITA/C66/sf/A (ITA), 2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mauro Maesa (1632)
- Black
- Maurizio Diotallevi (2011)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ITA/C66/sf/A (ITA)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mauro Maesa (1632) and Maurizio Diotallevi (2011) was played at ITA/C66/sf/A (ITA) in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mauro Maesa games or Maurizio Diotallevi games? This Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi?
Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Mauro Maesa.
What opening was played in Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mauro Maesa vs Maurizio Diotallevi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.