Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf
WS/H/563, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miloslav Macurek (1894)
- Black
- Henryk Krongraf (1722)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/H/563
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miloslav Macurek (1894) and Henryk Krongraf (1722) was played at WS/H/563 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (A89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miloslav Macurek games or Henryk Krongraf games? This Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf?
Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Miloslav Macurek.
What opening was played in Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Matulovic Variation (ECO A89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miloslav Macurek vs Henryk Krongraf, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.