Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques
CYCC U12B, 2005 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon (B54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Keith MacKinnon (2077)
- Black
- Liam Keith-Jacques
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CYCC U12B
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon (B54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Keith MacKinnon (2077) and Liam Keith-Jacques was played at CYCC U12B in 2005 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon (B54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Keith MacKinnon games or Liam Keith-Jacques games? This Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques?
Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques (2005) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon (ECO B54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Keith MacKinnon vs Liam Keith-Jacques, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.