Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador
42. TCh-ITA Masters, 2010 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bartlomiej Macieja (2618)
- Black
- Razel Jarie Salvador (2483)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 42. TCh-ITA Masters
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bartlomiej Macieja (2618) and Razel Jarie Salvador (2483) was played at 42. TCh-ITA Masters in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bartlomiej Macieja games or Razel Jarie Salvador games? This Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador?
Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Bartlomiej Macieja.
What opening was played in Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (ECO A13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bartlomiej Macieja vs Razel Jarie Salvador, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.