Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul
2016 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Slawomir Machlowski (2093)
- Black
- Wojciech Koszkul (2053)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Slawomir Machlowski (2093) and Wojciech Koszkul (2053) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Slawomir Machlowski games or Wojciech Koszkul games? This Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul?
Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Slawomir Machlowski vs Wojciech Koszkul, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.