Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz
2015 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wallace Fernandes Machado (1831)
- Black
- Luiz Alberto Da Luz (1446)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wallace Fernandes Machado (1831) and Luiz Alberto Da Luz (1446) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wallace Fernandes Machado games or Luiz Alberto Da Luz games? This Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz?
Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wallace Fernandes Machado vs Luiz Alberto Da Luz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.