Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta
2020 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Rodrigo Machado (1726)
- Black
- Marcio Netto Baeta (1953)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Rodrigo Machado (1726) and Marcio Netto Baeta (1953) was played in 2020 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Rodrigo Machado games or Marcio Netto Baeta games? This Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta?
Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta (2020) finished 0–1, a win for Marcio Netto Baeta.
What opening was played in Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (ECO B82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Rodrigo Machado vs Marcio Netto Baeta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.