Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski
WS/O/082, 2006 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Wojciech Oziminski
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/O/082
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young and Wojciech Oziminski was played at WS/O/082 in 2006 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young games or Wojciech Oziminski games? This Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski?
Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski (2006) finished 1–0, a win for Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young.
What opening was played in Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mrs. Judy MacCaellich-Young vs Wojciech Oziminski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.