Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum
US Amateur Team East 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Jack E Heublum (1745)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- US Amateur Team East 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zachary Michael Lyandres and Jack E Heublum (1745) was played at US Amateur Team East 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zachary Michael Lyandres games or Jack E Heublum games? This Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum?
Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Jack E Heublum.
What opening was played in Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zachary Michael Lyandres vs Jack E Heublum, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.