J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn
4NCL/Div4/SCS vs. HAL, 2008 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C72).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- J Arnold Lutton (1874)
- Black
- John D Llewelyn (1810)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL/Div4/SCS vs. HAL
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C72)
About this chess game
This chess game between J Arnold Lutton (1874) and John D Llewelyn (1810) was played at 4NCL/Div4/SCS vs. HAL in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C72). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more J Arnold Lutton games or John D Llewelyn games? This J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn?
J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (ECO C72).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of J Arnold Lutton vs John D Llewelyn, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.