Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov
Chigorin Memorial, 2012 · Result 1–0 · King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Lutovinov (2103)
- Black
- Magomed Dzhavathanov (1871)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Chigorin Memorial
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Lutovinov (2103) and Magomed Dzhavathanov (1871) was played at Chigorin Memorial in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (B07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Lutovinov games or Magomed Dzhavathanov games? This Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov?
Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Lutovinov.
What opening was played in Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game: Maróczy Defense (ECO B07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Lutovinov vs Magomed Dzhavathanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.