Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski
2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Krzysztof Lukasiewicz (1666)
- Black
- Konrad Drozdowski (1871)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Krzysztof Lukasiewicz (1666) and Konrad Drozdowski (1871) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Krzysztof Lukasiewicz games or Konrad Drozdowski games? This Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski?
Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Konrad Drozdowski.
What opening was played in Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Krzysztof Lukasiewicz vs Konrad Drozdowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.