Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski
POL/C67/sf (POL), 2022 · Result ½–½ · Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz (1650)
- Black
- Jaroslaw Dabrowski (1984)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- POL/C67/sf (POL)
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54)
About this chess game
This chess game between Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz (1650) and Jaroslaw Dabrowski (1984) was played at POL/C67/sf (POL) in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Italian Game: Classical Variation (C54). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz games or Jaroslaw Dabrowski games? This Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski?
Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Classical Variation (ECO C54).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Przemyslaw Lukasiewicz vs Jaroslaw Dabrowski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.